-----Original Message-----
From: Jack Cohen <jcohen2@bezeqint.net>
Sent: Sun, Jul 13, 2014
In the conflict in Gaza,
casualty figures play a large role especially in the minds of
uninvolved observers. When they hear that no Israelis have been killed by
missiles fired from Gaza into Israel, but that 160 Gazans have been killed by
Israeli counter-strikes, people tend to sympathize with the side that has the
larger body count. They are considered the "victims," but that is
simplistic.
Israel protects its
citizens: Notwithstanding the fact that ca. 850 missiles have been
fired from Gaza into Israel in the past week, starting the conflict, there have
been no deaths in Israel because the majority of the missiles targeted at
populated areas have been intercepted by the Iron Dome anti-missile
system. This is a remarkable innovation that has been developed by
Israel precisely to protect its civilian population from such repeated
attacks. The Code Red alarm sounds to warn civilians to run for
cover. But, two old people died from heart attacks and several were
injured by explosions and shrapnel.
You cannot believe
everything you read that comes out of Gaza: The estimate that 160
civilians have been killed to date in Gaza is an unreliable figure, since
this figure comes from Hamas sources (the "Ministry of Health") and is re-quoted
by all news media without any kind of verification or analysis. One reason
for this figure is that Hamas terrorist operatives do not wear uniforms,
they are irregulars. Hence it is impossible to distinguish them from
actual civilians. It is beyond credulity that all of those killed by
Israeli counter-strikes are actually civilians and that no combatants have been
killed, even though Israeli targeting is extremely accurate. It’s
anybody’s guess how many actual combatants and how many civilians have really
been killed. One estimate that three quarters of those killed by Israeli
strikes are actual civilians is merely guesswork and certainly an
exaggeration. I would put the percentage nearer 10%. This
is specifically because the IDF warns people by SMS message on their mobile
phones that a strike will occur on their house or in the vicinity! What
other Army in the world does this, to warn their enemy so as to reduce
their civilian casualties.
"The Palestinian
casualty amplification effect." Can you tell me how many
civilians have been killed in the current conflicts in Ukraine, Syria, Iraq or
Afghanistan in the past few days. Admit it, you have no idea, and really
you don't care,. yet the casualty count in Gaza is the most prominent number on
the news. Why is this? It's for two reasons, first exaggerated
sympathy for the poor Palestinians, the underdogs, the "victims" of Israel's
"brutal disproportionate aggression," and second because the enemies of the
Palestinians are the Jews and the Jews are aggressive and deliberately kill
people, according to the Western anti-Semitic stereotype. Note that
Palestinians being murdered in Syria by Assad's forces are not even
mentioned in the news. So Palestinian lives are worth more than those
of any other group of civilians in the world, as long as they are being
killed by Jews.
In wars people die: This is
of course all nonsense and
even though there are attempts by Israel (and not by the Ukrainians, the
Syrians, the Iraqis and the Afghanis) to reduce civilian casualties, there are
always going to be some (collateral damage), and in the case of Gaza
a very small number given the number of sorties flown by the IAF (now up to
ca. 1250). The news media are touting that several thousand
people have been forced to leave their homes, but where was their concern when 5
million Syrians were forced to leave their homes. In fact, several
IAF sorties have been called off if it is seen that there are civilians
nearby, including those placed on the roofs of houses as human shields
by the terrorists when they want to protect their facilities. Hamas
spokesmen have publicly called for people to stay in their houses when the IDF
warns them to leave. This is a war crime, but Hamas has not been
criticized in the media for this. One Palestinian spokeswoman denied this
report on Fox News and said that if true it would be "reprehensible," and then
the interviewer played the video showing the Hamas spokesman saying this and
she was crushed.
The difference is encapsulated in PM
Netanyahu's remarks at the start of the weekly Cabinet meeting: This is the entire difference between us and Hamas – we are
using defensive systems against missiles to protect the residents of Israel and
they are using the residents of Gaza to protect arsenals of missiles.
Nothing better underscores the difference in this
campaign.
No comments:
Post a Comment